<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Body Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage</link>
	<description>Digital Body Language is a blog about B2B Marketing and Demand Generation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Calculating the Value of a B2B Marketing Campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/calculating-the-value-of-a-b2b-marketing-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/calculating-the-value-of-a-b2b-marketing-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-3146675508462340923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s the ultimate question in marketing:What effect did this campaign have on revenue?In short buying cycles, where the buyer generally understands the category of the offering, and the transaction is quick and simple, this can be measured relatively...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It’s the ultimate question in marketing:<br /><br /><span >What effect did this campaign have on revenue?</span><br /><br />In short buying cycles, where the buyer generally understands the category of the offering, and the transaction is quick and simple, this can be measured relatively easily.  A marketing campaign results in a website visit, a product is added to the visitor’s shopping basket, and the transaction is completed.  Tying the buying event to that marketing campaign is both easy and sensible.  Various marketing campaigns can be analyzed to see what offer, and what creative, drive more revenue.<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1XJipF5wGI/AAAAAAAABYE/XBHlcHqOdZc/s1600-h/FunnelStages.jpg"><img  src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1XJipF5wGI/AAAAAAAABYE/XBHlcHqOdZc/s400/FunnelStages.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5428466522848346210" border="0" /></a><br /><br />But in the longer buying cycles we see in B2B, this analysis is not so simple.<br /><br />Buyers progress through a <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/mapping-buying-process-framework.html">buying process</a> at their own pace, facilitated by marketing messages and campaigns, but not necessarily driven by them.  Some campaigns may generate broad awareness, some might educate on criteria to consider, and some might trigger buying actions directly.  All are valuable, but measuring their value requires a different approach than in simple buying processes.<br /><br /><span >Understanding the Stages</span><br /><br />The first key step is to understand where each person is in their buying process.  Some may be just names in your database, either acquired names or names that have gone inactive.  Some may be interested, but not ready for sales yet, and some might be ready to engage with sales.  <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/06/lead-scoring-eight-critical-questions.html">Lead scoring</a> allows you to objectively define where each person is in their buying process.<br /><br />As part of this process, it’s important to make sure that buyers are removed from stages if time passes and they don’t continue to show the buying behaviour indicated.  As buying behaviour can be transient, with interest starting and stopping at various points, it’s key not to leave an individual marked as being at a certain stage if they are no longer as interested as they once were.<br /><br /><span >Associate Value with each Stage</span><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1XJihAMs_I/AAAAAAAABX8/xPj8Kky-y4o/s1600-h/FunnelConversions.jpg"><img  src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1XJihAMs_I/AAAAAAAABX8/xPj8Kky-y4o/s400/FunnelConversions.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5428466520676938738" border="0" /></a>With the buying stages defined, it’s now possible to look at historical conversion rates to understand the value of a lead at each stage.  For example, if a deal is worth $10,000, and an MQL has a 10% conversion rate to a deal, it is worth $1,000.  Similarly, if a lead at the “mild interest” stage has a 1% chance of converting, it is worth $100, and if a raw name that has not yet shown any interest has a 0.2% chance of turning into revenue, it is worth $20 per name.<br /><br />It’s important to note that these values are based on the conversion rate of the stage through to close, rather than the conversion rate to the subsequent stage.<br /><br /><span >Campaigns, Transitions, and Value</span><br /><br />Now, with this value per stage established, it is finally possible to see the value of a buyer’s movement through the funnel even if it does not directly translate to closed business or qualified leads being passed to sales.  For example, if a buyer moves from “mildly interested” ($100/lead) to “marketing qualified lead” ($1000/lead), their value has increased by $900.  Similarly, if a buyer moves from “inactive name” ($20/lead) to “mildly interested” ($100/lead), their value has increased by $80.  If net new leads enter the funnel, and are deemed to be “mildly interested”, they are immediately worth $100.<br /><br />If a marketing campaign triggered that transition to take place, the simplest way to look at the value of the marketing campaign is that it added that much value to your lead funnel.  If a campaign costs $50,000 and causes 1000 leads to move from “inactive name” to “mildly interested” (1000x$80), pushes 10 leads from “mildly interested” to “marketing qualified lead” status (10X$900), and creates 200 new “mildly interested” leads that were not previously in the marketing database (200X$100), the value of the marketing campaign can be calculated as:<br /><br />Cost of Campaign: $50,00<br /><br />Value of Campaign:<br />1000 X $80 =  $80,000<br />10 X $900    =    $9,000<br />200 X $100 =  $20,000<br />=================<br />Total:                          $109,000<br /><br />You can see that, if only the creation of qualified leads is looked at, the value of the campaign would appear to be very low, whereas it was a very successful and valuable campaign in that it triggered a lot of valuable early funnel <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/10/top-of-funnel-analysis-net-new-names.html">re-engagement of inactive names</a>, and generated new interest.<br /><br /><br /><span >Campaign Value</span><br /><br />Many campaigns that we run as marketers are targeted at top-of-funnel, or mid-funnel outcomes.  Generating net new names, educating buyers, establishing evaluation criteria, and nurturing buyers are all very valuable activities to perform.  However, they can be extremely difficult to measure unless there is a framework in place to assign value to each of the early stages in the buying process.<br /><br />When the right <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/06/analyzing-b2b-marketing-balance-sheet.html">marketing analysis framework</a> is in place, and each stage of the buying process can be measured, valued, and analyzed, it becomes possible to associate a clear value to campaigns that are targeted at top-of-funnel activities.  When we build the overall <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/09/marketing-dashboards.html">marketing dashboards</a> for our organizations, we can then value these campaigns in the same way that we value campaigns that target moving mildly interested leads further down the funnel until they are ready for a conversation with sales.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-3146675508462340923?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/DDjGdGrsKsM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/calculating-the-value-of-a-b2b-marketing-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Membership has its Privileges; Best Practices IP vs. Social CRM</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/membership-has-its-privileges-best-practices-ip-vs-social-crm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/membership-has-its-privileges-best-practices-ip-vs-social-crm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-5315527366604842242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote recently about our decision to expose our pricing publicly on our website.  It was one of the most commented-on posts ever on this blog, as it seems to have connected with a number of people in the same situation.  The intersection of theory an...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wrote recently about our decision to expose our <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/publicly-available-pricing-theory-and.html">pricing publicly on our website</a>.  It was one of the most commented-on posts ever on this blog, as it seems to have connected with a number of people in the same situation.  The intersection of theory and reality in the world of social media always spurs some interesting debates.  We all agree that transparency is great and noble... but...  what about the realities of having a broad set of products that range in price by a factor of over 10x?  What about low-end competitors who compete aggressively on price?  When reality and theory intersect it spurs some fun debates, and I appreciate all the comments from people in similar situations.<br /><br />Today, I want to share with you a similar change in philosophy that we just made at Eloqua, that had equally passionate debates.<br /><blockquote >Last week we opened up public access to <a href="https://eloqua.helpstream.biz/">Eloqua’s best practices community portal</a> where the biggest and most vibrant community of marketers gets to work, tackles challenging business problems, and builds the lead management processes that power their businesses.</blockquote><br />This caused substantial debate internally, that is likely not unique to Eloqua, as we wrestled with the pros and cons of making this change.  Given the response to the last post, I wanted to share with you our thinking on transparency, social CRM, and best practice knowledge.<br /><br /><span >Why do Marketers Upgrade?</span><br /><br />The challenge that we wrestled with was that one of the main reasons that our clients join us, or upgrade from low-end systems, is to join the “community”.  They want to compare notes with peers, understand how other marketers are engaging their sales teams, see what analytics their colleagues in similar industries have on their marketing dashboards, and get tips and tricks from people who have gone down this path before.  This "membership has its privileges" motivator was very compelling.<br /><br />The thought was, in opening up our online community portal, are we not giving away the “essence” of this community?  The knowledge, best practices, tips, tricks, analysis, and ideas are all there.  Could you not just buy a cheap-and-cheerful solution, and then leverage the experience and expertise of this community?<br /><br />It was a very valid question, and it caused us a lot of consideration.  In the end, after much debate, we opened up the portal and shared our expertise publicly.  Rather than decrease the value of this knowledge, through giving it away, we are trusting that it will greatly increase the enthusiasm of marketers to join the best marketers on a journey of transforming their businesses.<br /><br /><span >Does Sharing Expertise Increase or Decrease its Value?</span><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S5qsszX8z1I/AAAAAAAABe0/ATfPylelKR4/s1600-h/MikeHolmes.jpg"><img  src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S5qsszX8z1I/AAAAAAAABe0/ATfPylelKR4/s400/MikeHolmes.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5447856584962920274" border="0" /></a>One of the parallels that worked well to win over those who were hesitant internally was that of Mike Holmes on the home renovation TV show <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/small-business/the-making-of-mike-holmes/article1166896/">Holmes on Homes</a>.  Sharing his expertise publicly, week after week, to 100 Million TV viewers has not, in any way, reduced the demand for top quality home renovation contractors.  Far from it, it has increased it. <br /><br />Can home owners watch the show, take notes, and then do it themselves, or use a low cost contractor to get the work done?  Perhaps, but they now know the realities of the projects they are tackling, and are more likely to want to engage with a renovations contractor that brings expertise as well as power tools.<br /><br /><span >Sharing Marketers' Stories</span><br /><br />As with any company, we have long been sharing client stories of success.  We share videos of Mark DiMaurizio from Comcast Spectacor talking about how the Philadelphia Flyers and 76ers use <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MzxKTOAg_s&amp;feature=youtube_gdata">deep segmentation to connect with B2B and B2C buyers</a>, and we show Katina Fisk of Approva talking about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXaj9R7UnD8">marketing analysis and dashboarding</a>.<br /><br />These are great testimonial videos of the end state, and they highlight a great “finished product” in terms of results (thank you Mark and Katina).  However, what we wanted to showcase in opening up the community was how those results actually get built.  This is where the best marketers shine.<br /><br />In the online community, however, Amit Varshneya and Tom Svec look at the <a href="https://eloqua.helpstream.biz/Question.jsp?id=6a01eeaf4db3cf593b8fc85a48ccf6ec">nuts and bolts of building the type of deep segmentation</a> that Mark talked about by leveraging company-level rather than contact-level information.   Similarly Tricia Wilkerson looks at the specifics of <a href="https://eloqua.helpstream.biz/Question.jsp?id=f195d49a717b98cb1801861cac12b901">tracking and analyzing banner ad clickthroughs</a> in order to generate the type of marketing analysis Katina highlights.<br /><br />Each of these marketing success stories, like Mark and Katina’s, that we share comes from the work of marketers like Amit, Tom, and Tricia.  By sharing these stories, we hope to paint a picture of what marketing success truly looks like.  Will the passion for great marketing that is shared by community members outweigh any downsides of sharing this “under the floorboards” view?   We believe it will.<br /><br /><span ></span><br />Have you had similar internal debates about opening up your expertise to the world?  Please share them here, we would all benefit from your experiences on this topic.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-5315527366604842242?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/Ne4HyMo_akI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/membership-has-its-privileges-best-practices-ip-vs-social-crm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email as a Discoverable Medium</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/email-as-a-discoverable-medium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/email-as-a-discoverable-medium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-117123141876355916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote on Tuesday about the difference between messages being "delivered" and messages being "discovered".  Today, it's worth looking at that difference in approach via a very tangible marketing example.  As one of the most commonly used marketing med...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I wrote on Tuesday about the difference between <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/03/message-delivery-vs-message-discovery.html">messages being "delivered" and messages being "discovered"</a>.  Today, it's worth looking at that difference in approach via a very tangible marketing example.  As one of the most commonly used marketing mediums, email is worth using as an example.<br /><br />Email can be delivered in a very direct manner – a single email can be delivered to the exact recipient intended, assuming an email address is known and permission is granted – but that does not mean that the message has truly connected. I'm not talking about <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/02/all-you-never-cared-to-know-about.html">email deliverability</a>, although that remains an important topic, I'm talking about the ability of a message to be noticed or discovered by its recipient in an overflowing inbox.<br /><div><br />We each receive more email on a daily basis than we are able or willing to read. As we look through our inbox, this means that we make very quick decisions on which emails to read and which emails to ignore. This is based on the person or source from whom the email is received, and the subject line of the email. Receiving uninteresting or non-valuable content from a particular source quickly leads to a situation in which we recognize, and reflexively delete or ignore the content. This is known as an “<a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2008/12/emotional-unsubscribes.html">emotional unsubscribe</a>” as we have tuned out of the communication, and although we have not clicked the “unsubscribe” link, we are effectively at that state.<br /><br /><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBQwgvjMYI/AAAAAAAABNY/ZJFz8bjhteU/s1600/Discovery.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5408911946825281922"  alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBQwgvjMYI/AAAAAAAABNY/ZJFz8bjhteU/s400/Discovery.jpg" border="0" /></a>Once an email has been received and opened, most audience are quickly scanning for interesting content. If it is discovered, it might be read, but if it is not quickly seen, the email will be just as quickly deleted. This is why, as marketers, we need to think of email as a "discoverable" marketing medium in the same way that we might think of any topic shared in social media in terms of how likely it is to be "discovered".<br /><br />Each subject line and each article title within the email is a teaser that should be designed to capture the audience’s attention and compel them to want to read more. Without being misleading or deceitful, the best headlines intrigue readers and leave them wanting more information. Rather than assuming an email will be read, we as marketers can only assume that, at best, it might be browsed quickly.<br /><br />The onus is upon us to make the content within the email, and the headlines that introduce that content, compelling enough that the reader takes the time to read them and discovers the message within.  If they do, we have succeeded in having our information discovered.  If they do not, however, we have likely pushed that person <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/calculating-true-cost-of-email-campaign.html">one step further away from being open</a> to discovering our next communication.<br /></div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-117123141876355916?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/6bMokr9I_JU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/email-as-a-discoverable-medium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message Delivery vs. Message Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/message-delivery-vs-message-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/message-delivery-vs-message-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-8980993390641863667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most obvious change in marketing that we are seeing lately comes down to how our messages reach their intended recipients. This is driven, of course, by changes in the behavior of our audience of potential buyers.  The information “filters” we ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The most obvious change in marketing that we are seeing lately comes down to how our messages reach their intended recipients. This is driven, of course, by changes in the behavior of our audience of potential buyers.  The <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/12/publishing-vs-social-media-difference.html">information “filters”</a> we use are shifting from being economic filters, driven by publishers, to social filters, driven by the relevance of individuals and their messages. As this takes place, we as marketers need to shift towards thinking about how messages can be "discovered", rather than how they are delivered.<br /><div><br /><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBRmVDSoFI/AAAAAAAABNg/8OaLGnIBkMs/s1600/Discoverability.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5408912871399792722"  alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBRmVDSoFI/AAAAAAAABNg/8OaLGnIBkMs/s400/Discoverability.jpg" border="0" /></a>There is no more obvious place where this transition is happening than in the worlds of search and social media.<br /><br />Search, either natural or paid, provides an <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery.html">active way to discover information</a>. A prospective buyer actively seeks information on a given topic based on keywords. Successful marketers are able to ensure that their content is present at the top of the <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-search-in-b2b-marketing.html">search results</a>, either through an effective search engine optimization strategy, or through good search engine marketing and a healthy search marketing budget.<br /><br />In the various social media channels, however, information is not pushed out directly, but rather it is published, and then <span >discovered</span> by an audience based on recommendations from their peers, content syndication, and chance. The more interesting and relevant your content is, the larger an <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/dynamics-of-influencers.html">audience of influencers</a> will share it, forward it, and link to it, bringing it to the much broader audience that they influence.<br /><br /><span >Distribution via Influencers</span><br /><br />Unlike in search marketing, however, there is no clear metaphor for applying a marketing budget in order to achieve broader distribution of your information within social media. Although a variety of paid structures are being experimented with, none have received the wide acceptance that paid search marketing has.<br /></div><br /><div>This means that the most reliable way to ensure that your messages are maximally discoverable within the world of social media is to build strong relationships with the <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/12/evolution-of-social-influence.html">key influencers</a> in your space who are likely to share those messages and ensure that your messages are sufficiently interesting, relevant and non-salesy in order to make them shareable.<br /><br />Your long term reputation with each of these key influencers is based on a <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/01/you-cant-build-your-own-television.html">history of creating high quality content</a>, but each individual content piece stands on its own in terms of its ability to be found to be interesting and sharable. The techniques of great journalists are of use here in making each content piece most interesting and most likely to be read.<br /><br /><strong>Headlines, Teasers, and Discovery</strong><br /><br />Whether it is an article title, an interesting statistic, a tweet, a news headline, or a catchy name for an eBook, <span >the majority of your potential audience will only encounter the briefest of summaries of what your content is about</span>. Convincing your audience to take the step from headline to content by clicking on your content is as much art as is it science.<br /><blockquote ><br />The better the headline catches the potential reader’s attention, without being misleading, the more the content is read and the messages within it discovered.</blockquote><br />The art of writing provocative, catchy, and intriguing summaries of information in just a few words was originally developed by newspaper editors writing headlines. Their goal was to have their publication “discovered” by those passing by a news stand. Now, in a world dominated by the need to make information discoverable, these skills are required more than ever. Each article, headline, or tweet should be thought of in the same light. The better the headline catches the potential reader’s attention, without being misleading, the more the content is read and the messages within it discovered.</div><br /><div> </div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-8980993390641863667?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/oJyjvctDe6w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/message-delivery-vs-message-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV is Dead.  Long Live TV.</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/tv-is-dead-long-live-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/tv-is-dead-long-live-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-4737384924632529733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great post by Brian Halligan at HubSpot, on a dinner he had with a group of Madison Avenue folks, got me thinking about some possible futures for Television.  Contrary to the prevailing wisdom, I don't think that Television is about to suffer the sam...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A great post by Brian Halligan at HubSpot, on a dinner he had with a group of <a href="http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/5619/My-Dinner-With-Google-Madison-Avenue.aspx">Madison Avenue folks</a>, got me thinking about some possible futures for Television.  Contrary to the prevailing wisdom, I don't think that Television is about to suffer the same fate as newspapers as information becomes free.<br /><br /><span >Here's why - we're lazy.</span><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S32k8fjfSEI/AAAAAAAABcs/qqTBg3bebnM/s1600-h/Television.jpg"><img  src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S32k8fjfSEI/AAAAAAAABcs/qqTBg3bebnM/s400/Television.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5439685284102883394" border="0" /></a>I recently watched some Olympics coverage, and was impressed with the seamless flow back and forth from the events that were being shown to a physiologist talking about the effect on the human body of the snowboard half-pipe, to a profile of one of the upcoming short track speedskaters, to an in depth look at how moguls are judged, to an interview with a hockey coach.  It was this careful orchestration of content that made the experience enjoyable, and all I had to do was sit back and take it in.  For that, I watched a few ads.<br /><br /><span >Could I have found all of that content online? Probably.  But the point is I couldn't be bothered.</span><br /><br />In a similar manner, iTunes beats out online downloading of music for many people.  I don't subscribe to the idea that we download via iTunes because of a profound respect for copyright law (see <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/larry_lessig_says_the_law_is_strangling_creativity.html">Larry Lessig at TED on that topic</a>).  I strongly believe that many of us use iTunes just because it is easier.  It's just plain easier to find, download, and be assured of quality.  For that, 99c is worth it.<br /><br /><span >Television fits this iTunes model.</span><br /><br />Television, generally, does a great job of orchestrating, curating, and sequencing the content.  This has a value that needs to be appreciated by anyone predicting the downfall of television.  I suspect that we, as viewers, will demonstrate a willingness to "pay" for that value through advertising.<br /><br />Newspapers, while also providing content, don't cater to the same level of passively experiencing the content.  One needs to leaf through a newspaper, pick an article, and read it.  Far more active of an experience - and not much different than finding the same article online.<br /><br />Of course, the question of what happens to the classic "30 second spot" is up in the air.  Exactly how we "pay" for television with our attention is a bit unclear, but economics will find a way.  Whether it is through deeper integration of product placements, integrated story-telling, or better targeting or quality of 30 second ads that make us want to watch, the model can be found.<br /><br />What do you think?  Is there a future for Television?<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-4737384924632529733?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/qOPoT2UYbJA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/tv-is-dead-long-live-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social media analysis moves mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/social-media-analysis-moves-mainstream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/social-media-analysis-moves-mainstream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-1234985640271039424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Webtrends announced that they had extended their customer intelligence capabilities into Facebook.  In this new integration, there are two things happening that are worth commenting on.  First, there is a continuing move to see a unified vie...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week, Webtrends announced that they had extended their <a href="http://blogs.webtrends.com/blog/2010/02/25/revolutionary-new-facebook-tab-measurement-from-webtrends/">customer intelligence capabilities into Facebook</a>.  In this new integration, there are two things happening that are worth commenting on.  First, there is a continuing move to see a unified view of online behaviour, and online messages across all communication channels, and not a siloed view where each individual communication platform is treated as somehow separate.<br /><br />In exploring the Webtrends solution, you can see this evolution taking place.  When a blog post is written, Tweeted about, then shared on Facebook this is a natural way that information flows in today’s environment.  An analytics platform that treats each of the platforms as silos would be forcing marketers to think of communications by “silo” not by “idea”, and that would be a significant mistake.  The barriers between social platforms, and between those platforms and our blogs and web properties are rapidly disappearing and already virtually non-existent.<br /><br />This manifests in both the way that the data is captured (not just within properties under our direct control like main websites, but wherever the audience is, such as on Facebook) and in how it is presented, as an integrated view of activity across communication platforms.<br /><br />The second interesting trend that became apparent in looking at this integration of Facebook activity into the marketing analysis world was the lack of campaign centricity.  Facebook, as with almost all social media efforts, has a “flywheel” dynamic to it.  Effort is put in continually, and over time, the success begins to build slowly, but with its own momentum.  This is drastically different than typical marketing campaign efforts where each campaign has a fairly <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/11/sales-and-marketing-alignment.html">defined investment/payback model</a>; a point-in-time investment which is tied to a short-term payback.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S4fqYNeQmdI/AAAAAAAABdk/X1w-tbMa_Nk/s1600-h/WebtrendsFacebook.jpg"><img  src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S4fqYNeQmdI/AAAAAAAABdk/X1w-tbMa_Nk/s400/WebtrendsFacebook.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5442576376354871762" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Webtrends shows metrics on community success (views, shares, fans, etc), and indicates through “flags” where the driving events (such as blog posts, tweets, and marketing promotions) took place.  By doing this, they guide marketers to the view that the driving events are there to build community, engagement, and <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/dynamics-of-influencers.html">influencers</a>, which will then over time drive the creation of qualified leads.  This view is significantly different than the more direct campaign-to-lead model of typical marketing, but a much more accurate representation of the marketing realities of social media.<br /><br />As we market to B2B buyers, optimizing how <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/12/publishing-vs-social-media-difference.html">information finds its way to them</a> is crucial.  To do this well means that we need to think more in terms of the ideas, and less in terms of the channel by which the information is disseminated.  Similarly, as we build our engagement with our buying audiences in social media, we need to think more in terms of how our efforts are building and driving community success, rather than thinking in terms of single campaigns.  With their new ability to analyze Facebook, understand the flow of ideas across social media channels, and see community success mapped against the events that drove it, Webtrends helps us make important steps in this direction.<br /><br />What do you think?  Have you tried their new capability in your environment?  What insights are you able to gain from it that you weren’t able to get previously?<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-1234985640271039424?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/DTlUVjjqTPM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/03/social-media-analysis-moves-mainstream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publicly Available Pricing: Theory and Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/publicly-available-pricing-theory-and-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/publicly-available-pricing-theory-and-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-5380162810630008728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of what I write on this blog has to do with the changes that have happened as a result of buyers’ increasing access to information.  Often, these changes are looked at from a general perspective.  Today, I want to look a very specific example o...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S4NL018vlZI/AAAAAAAABdc/AyKuhE999gk/s1600-h/NewIdea.jpg"><img  src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S4NL018vlZI/AAAAAAAABdc/AyKuhE999gk/s400/NewIdea.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5441276146000827794" border="0" /></a>A lot of what I write on this blog has to do with the changes that have happened as a result of buyers’ increasing access to information.  Often, these changes are looked at from a general perspective.  Today, I want to look a very specific example of how this overall market transition affected us at Eloqua.  It’s a very representative, specific, example of what’s going on in the market in general.<br /><br /><span >Last week we made the <a href="http://www.eloqua.com/products/">pricing for Eloqua’s software product packages</a> public on our website for the first time:</span><br /><br /><span >The starting prices range from $1450 to $10,000 per month, depending on the level selected.</span><br /><br />Just hearing this likely makes everyone who has ever been a field sales rep cringe.  Won’t this blow up deals?  What if an Enterprise buyer hears of an SMB buyer making a purchase at 1/10th the price?  Won’t you be excluded from deals based on the price being seen as too high (or too low)?<br /><br />Unfortunately, these arguments are based on an incorrect assumption that without talking to our sales team, buyers will not have the ability to form these perceptions of our price.  That assumption, however, is false.  Now, buyers are able to gather information, form opinions, and come to conclusions without ever talking to a salesperson.  The <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/10/relationships-salespeoples-biggest.html">sales team is competing with Google</a> as a source for information, and that is not an easy battle to win.<br /><br />So, with the market transmitting information very efficiently, the question for us was not whether the market should have access to opinions on our pricing – they already had formed opinions.  The question was whether those perceptions could be better guided by contributing accurate information to the conversation. <br /><br />In our case, the breadth of organizations we served had led to a perception in the SMB market that we were significantly more expensive than we actually were.  So, we were better off to correct that data point in the market, rather than allow mis-perceptions to be the guiding data point, as that could easily lead to not being considered in a deal at all if the perception was significantly different than reality.<br /><br />As with any change of this type, agreeing on the theory of what is happening in the market is much easier than the tactical implementation of the changes that are needed.  There was much debate internally, and many points of view were raised.  However, the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, and even in the short time it has been public a number of conversations have started with buyers who had held misperceptions of price.<br /><br />Are there any changes like this that your organization is considering that are easier to agree to in theory than in practice?  Will you move forward with them?<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-5380162810630008728?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/Zq2AsT5j7yY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/publicly-available-pricing-theory-and-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Display Ads, and B2B Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/google-display-ads-and-b2b-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/google-display-ads-and-b2b-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-6455971528657990075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google just pushed a tiny bit further into their long-stated strategy of making display advertising their next billion dollar business.  Former DoubleClick exec Barry Salzman joined the team to bring this vision closer to reality, and it’s expected t...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S32LVU_rxrI/AAAAAAAABck/zC8HvRw5cFY/s1600-h/BarrySalzman.jpg"><img  src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S32LVU_rxrI/AAAAAAAABck/zC8HvRw5cFY/s400/BarrySalzman.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5439657123462760114" border="0" /></a>Google just pushed a tiny bit further into their long-stated strategy of making display advertising their next billion dollar business.  Former DoubleClick exec <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/barrysalzman">Barry Salzman</a> joined the team to bring this vision closer to reality, and it’s expected that we’ll see more movement from Google in this direction over the next year.<br /><br /><span >What does this strategy mean for B2B marketers?  A lot.</span><br /><br />As B2B marketers, we love search, both natural, and paid, as it gives us a highly precise way of targeting buyers based on a real-time understanding of their interests.  If someone searches for “demand generation”, we can reasonably assume, that at that moment in time, they are quite interested in learning about “demand generation”.  Targeting our messages against a profile that accurate makes sense in an environment where we are selling products that are often complex, expensive, and highly considered, to a very narrow audience of business people who are interested.<br /><br /><span ><span >The Flaw With Search</span></span><br /><br />The problem with this is that it relies on the prospect to <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery.html">"actively" seek information</a>.  They need to make the effort to perform a search for a specific piece of information, and when they do, we are able to present them with a message.  This works well, but only in situations where they are actively searching for a specific type of information.  Outside of that, we have no way to reach them.  This means that any messages we would like them to discover more “passively” in order to start them thinking about new areas that their business could be improved, change their perceptions of a certain solution, or highlight an area to consider that they may not have considered, we are unable to get that message in front of them.<br /><br />This <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery.html">active/passive challenge</a> for marketers is about to move to the fore-front as Google brings its weight into the display search game.  With its heavy investments in social media, with the new <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/02/buzz-about-google-buzz-6-things.html">Buzz platform</a>, and the full Twitter feed, as well as the algorithms to understand these in real time, Google is in an enviable position.  This data allows Google to begin to understand who is interested in what at any given moment, and who the <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/dynamics-of-influencers.html">influencers</a> are in that particular market.<br /><br /><span > <span >Intention-Based Advertising</span></span><br /><br />Far more than the loose, mainly demographic-based, targeting that is currently available to marketers in display search, Google will conceivably be able to present display ads based on actual area of interest and intent (acting more in the role of <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/four-reasons-for-information-concierge.html">information concierge</a>).  Much as we currently target search ads based on the key phrase typed, we may soon be able to target display ads based on key phrases that are <span >not </span>typed – just acted on.  As prospective buyers show an interest in investigating a certain area, say by clicking on a link, shared socially, that refers to an article on generating more leads for sales, Google may be able to then show them a display Ad targeted at any interest in “demand generation”.<br /><br />Right now it is difficult to target prospective B2B buyers “passively”, so much of our marketing efforts are designed around making it easier for prospective buyers to find us when they are actively looking.  <span ><br />This may soon change.</span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-6455971528657990075?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/s_4vhLPX_wY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/google-display-ads-and-b2b-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash Flow Statement as a Metaphor: Sources and Uses of Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/cash-flow-statement-as-a-metaphor-sources-and-uses-of-leads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/cash-flow-statement-as-a-metaphor-sources-and-uses-of-leads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-5384448637926938133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier, we introduced the financial metaphors for balance sheet and income statement when looking at B2B marketing analysis.  Following on the same financial metaphor, a “cash flow” statement can show valuable insights into the sources and uses of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Earlier, we introduced the financial metaphors for <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/06/analyzing-b2b-marketing-balance-sheet.html">balance sheet and income statement</a> when looking at B2B marketing analysis.  Following on the same financial metaphor, a “cash flow” statement can show valuable insights into the sources and uses of leads, allowing you to <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/09/marketing-dashboards.html">dashboard</a> the lead flow within your organization in order to understand which territories, product lines, or business segments are seeing more lead flow than others, and whether the leads are being successfully converted into opportunities.<br /><br />Understanding which sales teams are seeing the best sourcing of leads gives a good sense of whether there is any imbalance in the lead flows.  For example, in the following data, you can see that although the West is generally getting more leads, they are of significantly lower quality.  Similarly, while there are lots of leads for Widget B being generated, there is a significant imbalance in lead flow to reps in the East.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1-b0JHTUQI/AAAAAAAABYs/1d7oCaUiMEc/s1600-h/LeadSourceReport.jpg"><img  src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1-b0JHTUQI/AAAAAAAABYs/1d7oCaUiMEc/s400/LeadSourceReport.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5431230995734155522" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br />With this understanding of which territories, product lines, and salespeople are provided with leads, the next step is to provide insight into the outcome of those leads once they have been <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/09/lead-handoff-and-sales-measurement.html">handed off to sales</a>.  Done properly, the <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/05/lead-scoring-providing-disposition.html">disposition of leads</a> by a sales team after they attempt to connect with them should not only trigger a marketing process to correctly handle the leads, but also provide clear insights into the quality of the leads.  If the leads were unreachable, lacked interest, were not the right role, or only had early stage interest, this insight allows marketing to see whether there are potential quality issues with their leads.<br /><br />Likewise, if certain sales reps are doing a poor job in following up with the leads they are given, this will also show up in the analytics of lead disposition.  In the following lead disposition chart, for example, you can see that both Bob Clark and Jane Chen received a large number of leads, but failed to convert many of them to opportunities, instead resorting to voicemails or calling back in 90 days.  This may be an indication of a performance or training challenge with these two sales reps.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1-b0a7d8EI/AAAAAAAABY0/3KxwpcpsEio/s1600-h/LeadDispositionReport.jpg"><img  src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/S1-b0a7d8EI/AAAAAAAABY0/3KxwpcpsEio/s400/LeadDispositionReport.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5431231000516358210" border="0" /></a><br /><br />The more visibility we introduce to our processes for building interest, qualifying leads, handing them to sales, and having sales connect in order to grow a revenue opportunity, the better we are able to improve those processes.  The cash flow statement, as a metaphor, provides a great way to look at which sales teams are getting good sources of leads, and what the uses of those leads are.  The ability to optimize this lead flow or guide the sales team's response lets us optimize revenue quickly and effectively.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-5384448637926938133?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/nsl5foXwsUY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/cash-flow-statement-as-a-metaphor-sources-and-uses-of-leads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passive Discovery vs Active Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b2b marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead nurturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuture marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales and marketing alignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7794386793170803972.post-7245808822072110765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In looking at the messaging architecture you put together for each buyer role  and how they progress through their buying process, it’s important to think through how the message you need to get to the buyers will be discovered. Some will be "activel...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In looking at the messaging architecture you put together for each <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/05/detecting-buyer-roles-in-b2b-marketing.html">buyer role</a>  and how they progress through their <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/02/scoring-stages-of-buying-process.html">buying process</a>, it’s important to think through <span >how the message you need to get to the buyers will be discovered</span>. Some will be "actively discovered", and some will be "passively discovered".  It is crucial to understand the difference as it guides what strategy we need to take as marketers.<br /><br /><span >Active Discovery</span><br /><br />Many of the marketing messages you want to be found by buyers will be found by the buyer explicitly taking an action (ie a Google Search) to seek out the information.  This is the metaphor we think of for clearly defined information, such as feature capabilities, that are looked for specifically by name.<br /><div><br /><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBEM3cmGnI/AAAAAAAABNQ/wMGKak9TQic/s1600/StoryTelling.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5408898140304972402"  alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QT7_Lm5Yssg/SxBEM3cmGnI/AAAAAAAABNQ/wMGKak9TQic/s400/StoryTelling.jpg" border="0" /></a>Here, the challenge is quite clearly defined; a buyer is actively seeking a piece of information, usually with search, although perhaps in community discussions or on social bookmarking sites. As a marketer, you need to ensure that your message is present, and in a way that makes it easy for the buyer to <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-search-in-b2b-marketing.html">find it on a search engine</a>. Although the art and science of search marketing is sufficiently challenging to warrant the creation of an entire industry, the problem being solved is quite clearly defined.<br /><br /><span >Passive Discovery</span><br /><br />This is not the case, however, for more passive messages that need to find their way to potential buyers. Passive messages are messages that would not be actively sought by potential buyer, such as messages that alter pre-conceived notions of reliability, applicability of a solution to a certain industry, and perceptions of product usability, service quality, or price-point.<br /><br />These messages, as they are <span >not actively sought</span>, must be built into other stories that can be discovered, or carefully presented by an "<a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2010/01/four-reasons-for-information-concierge.html">Information Concierge</a>".  for example, a pre-conceived notion of the applicability of a solution to a certain industry can be shifted by seeing that solution mentioned as a key part of a client success story. A sense that prices are higher than they actually are can be adjusted by sharing stories that relate to smaller or cost-conscious businesses. A perception of user challenges can be changed by stories that mention a large, vibrant, and happy user community.<br /><br /><span >Story-Telling and Passive Discovery</span><br /><br />The use of the idea of stories is deliberate. There is no more effective way of conveying a passive message, such as a change in perceptions, than through a story that is shared by one peer to another. Word of mouth messaging is the most effective way of changing perceptions because it comes from trusted peers, and cannot effectively be bought or biased by marketing budgets.<br /><br />However, marketers looking to change perceptions, introduce ideas, and challenge pre-conceived notions, must introduce stories that are easily told. These are not the dry, ROI-driven, case studies that celebrate and trumpet our showcase clients, but are stories that entertain, inspire, or challenge their audiences.  There is no reason that we must avoid the idea of having <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/11/longevity-of-fun-in-b2b-social-media.html">fun with B2B marketing campaigns</a>.<br /><br />Marketers, especially <a href="http://digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-is-b2b-marketing.html">B2B marketers</a>, who are effective at finding and packaging the truly interesting stories that tend to get shared via word of mouth have an opportunity to subtly focus on certain messages or perceptions that they need to change in the market.<br /><br /></div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7794386793170803972-7245808822072110765?l=digitalbodylanguage.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DigitalBodyLanguage/~4/1N0388dhVjY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/digitalbodylanguage/2010/02/passive-discovery-vs-active-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
