<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ClickZ News Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog</link>
	<description>News for the digital marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>So Long ClickZ News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/so-long-clickz-news-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/so-long-clickz-news-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100202-144422.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><br />A quick note, readers, to let you know that this blog will soon be shuttered and its content merged with ClickZ's regular news and features coverage. </p>

<p>The news and commentary you're used to seeing here will soon begin to appear over in ClickZ's <a href="http://www.clickz.com/news">regular news section</a>. To subscribe to all our news content, please see our <a href="http://www.clickz.com/subscribe">e-mail newsletter</a> and <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz_rss">RSS feed</a> subscription pages.</p>

<p>As for the back-story: we created the ClickZ News Blog in 2005 as an experiment in format - a way for our reporters to cover digital marketing outside the confines of traditional journalism. In doing so, we intended to follow in the footsteps of entrepreneurial news organizations like TechCrunch, Politico, PaidContent, and others that prioritize chasing tips and fleshing out back-stories over covering press releases.</p>

<p>It's served that purpose well. Over the past three years the blog has built a solid following of marketers who look to it for breaking news, analysis, and aggregated content from around the Web. </p>

<p>However, it also has its drawbacks. Publishing it requires us to maintain a separate CMS, taxonomy, and analytics tools.  And it lacks its own e-mail newsletter, a key way we deliver other content to you. </p>

<p>More importantly, we've come to the conclusion that some readers are confused - understandably so - about the difference between ClickZ News, our flagship daily reporting package, and the more casual and freewheeling ClickZ News Blog. </p>

<p>To cure these ills, we've decided simply to combine the two sections. As a result, our regular industry coverage will soon be flavored with some "bloggy" conventions, such as use of the first person and aggregated news posts. As we go through these changes, rest assured ClickZ's news team remains committed to the fundamentals of journalism, including in-depth reporting and analysis. </p>

<p>The integration will take place in about one week. Meanwhile, please head over to our <a href="http://www.clickz.com/subscribe">e-mail newsletter</a> and <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz_rss">RSS feed</a> subscription pages to ensure you continue to receive this content.<br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/hAKdg5Gf8xQ" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br />A quick note, readers, to let you know that this blog will soon be shuttered and its content merged with ClickZ's regular news and features coverage. </p>

<p>The news and commentary you're used to seeing here will soon begin to appear over in ClickZ's <a href="http://www.clickz.com/news">regular news section</a>. To subscribe to all our news content, please see our <a href="http://www.clickz.com/subscribe">e-mail newsletter</a> and <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz_rss">RSS feed</a> subscription pages.</p>

<p>As for the back-story: we created the ClickZ News Blog in 2005 as an experiment in format - a way for our reporters to cover digital marketing outside the confines of traditional journalism. In doing so, we intended to follow in the footsteps of entrepreneurial news organizations like TechCrunch, Politico, PaidContent, and others that prioritize chasing tips and fleshing out back-stories over covering press releases.</p>

<p>It's served that purpose well. Over the past three years the blog has built a solid following of marketers who look to it for breaking news, analysis, and aggregated content from around the Web. </p>

<p>However, it also has its drawbacks. Publishing it requires us to maintain a separate CMS, taxonomy, and analytics tools.  And it lacks its own e-mail newsletter, a key way we deliver other content to you. </p>

<p>More importantly, we've come to the conclusion that some readers are confused - understandably so - about the difference between ClickZ News, our flagship daily reporting package, and the more casual and freewheeling ClickZ News Blog. </p>

<p>To cure these ills, we've decided simply to combine the two sections. As a result, our regular industry coverage will soon be flavored with some "bloggy" conventions, such as use of the first person and aggregated news posts. As we go through these changes, rest assured ClickZ's news team remains committed to the fundamentals of journalism, including in-depth reporting and analysis. </p>

<p>The integration will take place in about one week. Meanwhile, please head over to our <a href="http://www.clickz.com/subscribe">e-mail newsletter</a> and <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz_rss">RSS feed</a> subscription pages to ensure you continue to receive this content.<br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/hAKdg5Gf8xQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/so-long-clickz-news-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coke Clobbering Pepsi on Facebook, But Not on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/coke-clobbering-pepsi-on-facebook-but-not-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/coke-clobbering-pepsi-on-facebook-but-not-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100202-142336.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One has to credit Pepsi's commitment to charitable programs in its <a href="http://www.refresheverything.com/" target="_blank"> "Refresh Project,"</a> which will ultimately donate $20 million to local community projects.<br />
 <br />
For more than a month, the soft drinks maker has been hammering the PR message that it's going to use Facebook, Twitter, and other social media entities to promote the initiative. Pepsi's been touting these ideas while pointing out - in a self-congratulatory fashion - that it's passing on a Super Bowl ad for the first time in 23 years in favor of social media buzz.<br />
 <br />
Well, this led me to check out the brand's Facebook presence this morning. It had 307,326 "fans."<br />
 <br />
That piqued my curiosity to see what Coke's Facebook presence looked like. Somewhat surprising was the humongous gap between the "big two" - Coke has more than 4.5 <em>million</em> "fans."<br />
 <br />
But the social media picture is not all bad for Pepsi. It has 20,923 "followers" on Twitter, while Coke has 15,798. </p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/sNQrKlnPovg" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One has to credit Pepsi's commitment to charitable programs in its <a href="http://www.refresheverything.com/" > "Refresh Project,"</a> which will ultimately donate $20 million to local community projects.<br />
 <br />
For more than a month, the soft drinks maker has been hammering the PR message that it's going to use Facebook, Twitter, and other social media entities to promote the initiative. Pepsi's been touting these ideas while pointing out - in a self-congratulatory fashion - that it's passing on a Super Bowl ad for the first time in 23 years in favor of social media buzz.<br />
 <br />
Well, this led me to check out the brand's Facebook presence this morning. It had 307,326 "fans."<br />
 <br />
That piqued my curiosity to see what Coke's Facebook presence looked like. Somewhat surprising was the humongous gap between the "big two" - Coke has more than 4.5 <em>million</em> "fans."<br />
 <br />
But the social media picture is not all bad for Pepsi. It has 20,923 "followers" on Twitter, while Coke has 15,798. </p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/sNQrKlnPovg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/coke-clobbering-pepsi-on-facebook-but-not-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Expands Media Partnership Staff</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/twitter-expands-media-partnership-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/twitter-expands-media-partnership-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100202-103632.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://blog.clickz.com/100112-55941.html">ads</a> it posted last month seeking monetization staff, Twitter has hired a new media partnership exec in the shape of Robin Sloan.</p>

<p>In a <a href="http://robinsloan.com/2010/1150">blog post</a>, Sloan confirmed his appointment, and said his role would involve "everything at the intersection of Twitter and media." It's unclear at this point if that will include anything directly marketing related, but the assumption is that said partnerships are likely to include some kind of sponsorship element.</p>

<p>According to Sloan, he will work alongside existing media partnership Twitter staffer, Chloe Sladden, both of which previously held positions at Current TV. He starts mid-February.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/UMtNJXM1f30" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://blog.clickz.com/100112-55941.html">ads</a> it posted last month seeking monetization staff, Twitter has hired a new media partnership exec in the shape of Robin Sloan.</p>

<p>In a <a href="http://robinsloan.com/2010/1150">blog post</a>, Sloan confirmed his appointment, and said his role would involve "everything at the intersection of Twitter and media." It's unclear at this point if that will include anything directly marketing related, but the assumption is that said partnerships are likely to include some kind of sponsorship element.</p>

<p>According to Sloan, he will work alongside existing media partnership Twitter staffer, Chloe Sladden, both of which previously held positions at Current TV. He starts mid-February.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/UMtNJXM1f30" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/02/twitter-expands-media-partnership-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad Video Brouhaha: Apple Caught Wearing a Toupee?</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/ipad-video-brouhaha-apple-caught-wearing-a-toupee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/ipad-video-brouhaha-apple-caught-wearing-a-toupee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100129-120007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://9to5mac.com/apple-flash-ipad-3954934055" target="_blank">Sites are buzzing</a> today about what appears to be a misleading product video Apple has produced to sell its iPad. An eight-minute clip on YouTube depicts NYTimes.com on the device at about the 2:04 mark. The clip shows The Times' Video section fully rendered, including a Flash element that sits above an article in the newspaper's Travel section.</p>

<p>Here's a screen-grab from the video that shows (apologies for the blurriness) the Video section center-left:<br />
<a href="http://blog.clickz.com/ipadcontro.take%20two.jpg"><img alt="ipadcontro.take two.jpg" src="http://blog.clickz.com/assets_c/2010/01/ipadcontro.take two-thumb-420x242-6253.jpg" width="420" height="242" class="mt-image-none" /></a></p>

<p>But of course, as Steve Jobs himself showed at the product unveiling <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636291"> on Wednesday</a>, Flash doesn't work on the iPad:</p>

<p><img alt="Steve Jobs.JPG" src="http://blog.clickz.com/Steve%20Jobs.JPG" width="551" height="327" class="mt-image-none" /></p>

<p>It's not the end of the world - a marketer fudging the truth in a sales pitch. But shame on Apple for trying to sneak this by the gadget-conscious universe. That's almost like Patrick Stewart showing up at a Trekkie convention wearing a toupee and expecting nary a double-take. <br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/StuBrduKlgA" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://9to5mac.com/apple-flash-ipad-3954934055" >Sites are buzzing</a> today about what appears to be a misleading product video Apple has produced to sell its iPad. An eight-minute clip on YouTube depicts NYTimes.com on the device at about the 2:04 mark. The clip shows The Times' Video section fully rendered, including a Flash element that sits above an article in the newspaper's Travel section.</p>

<p>Here's a screen-grab from the video that shows (apologies for the blurriness) the Video section center-left:<br />
<a href="http://blog.clickz.com/ipadcontro.take%20two.jpg"><img alt="ipadcontro.take two.jpg" src="http://blog.clickz.com/assets_c/2010/01/ipadcontro.take two-thumb-420x242-6253.jpg" width="420" height="242" class="mt-image-none"  /></a></p>

<p>But of course, as Steve Jobs himself showed at the product unveiling <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636291"> on Wednesday</a>, Flash doesn't work on the iPad:</p>

<p><img alt="Steve Jobs.JPG" src="http://blog.clickz.com/Steve%20Jobs.JPG" width="551" height="327" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p>It's not the end of the world - a marketer fudging the truth in a sales pitch. But shame on Apple for trying to sneak this by the gadget-conscious universe. That's almost like Patrick Stewart showing up at a Trekkie convention wearing a toupee and expecting nary a double-take. <br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/StuBrduKlgA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/ipad-video-brouhaha-apple-caught-wearing-a-toupee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next GOP Money Bomb? There&#8217;s an Ad for That.</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/next-gop-money-bomb-theres-an-ad-for-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/next-gop-money-bomb-theres-an-ad-for-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100128-111832.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="/news/politics-advocacy"><img src="/_imgs/clickz-politics-advocacy.gif" alt="ClickZ News - Politics &#38; Advocacy" border="0"></a><a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636180">Scott Brown made headlines</a> with his one-day "Money Bomb" fundraiser that became a week-long phenomenon raking in millions for the newly-elected Senator from Massachusetts. Now, Republican primary candidate for Senate in Florida, Marco Rubio (he's running an increasingly tight race against Governor Charlie Crist) is using a similar tactic. That's Rubio pictured below at "Bike Night" in Clearwater, FL the other night.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/marcorubiomoneybomb.jpg"></p>

<p><img src="http://blog.clickz.com/rubioonbike.jpg" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5">And, The Senate Conservatives Fund PAC is running display ads to promote their Rubio fundraising effort - even to people outside the Sunshine State. The ad uses a photo of Crist pictured in cozy contact with the President. I just spotted one on Newsbusters, where I was reading a very important story about how the Obama Girl thinks the Prez needs to focus more on job creation. </p>

<p>The Republicans have become big on advertising for all sorts of things. Yesterday, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell's PAC ran display and search ads on Google to promote his rebuttal to last night's State of the Union Address. If you did a search on "state of the union" you may have seen one.</p>


<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/mccdonnell_sotu_rebuttal.jpeg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/uytJIUovHCc" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/news/politics-advocacy"><img src="/_imgs/clickz-politics-advocacy.gif" alt="ClickZ News - Politics & Advocacy" title="ClickZ News - Politics & Advocacy" border="0" /></a><a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636180">Scott Brown made headlines</a> with his one-day "Money Bomb" fundraiser that became a week-long phenomenon raking in millions for the newly-elected Senator from Massachusetts. Now, Republican primary candidate for Senate in Florida, Marco Rubio (he's running an increasingly tight race against Governor Charlie Crist) is using a similar tactic. That's Rubio pictured below at "Bike Night" in Clearwater, FL the other night.<br />
<center><br />
<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/marcorubiomoneybomb.jpg"></center></p>

<p><img src="http://blog.clickz.com/rubioonbike.jpg" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5">And, The Senate Conservatives Fund PAC is running display ads to promote their Rubio fundraising effort - even to people outside the Sunshine State. The ad uses a photo of Crist pictured in cozy contact with the President. I just spotted one on Newsbusters, where I was reading a very important story about how the Obama Girl thinks the Prez needs to focus more on job creation. </p>

<p>The Republicans have become big on advertising for all sorts of things. Yesterday, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell's PAC ran display and search ads on Google to promote his rebuttal to last night's State of the Union Address. If you did a search on "state of the union" you may have seen one.</p>

<center>
<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/mccdonnell_sotu_rebuttal.jpeg"></center><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/uytJIUovHCc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/next-gop-money-bomb-theres-an-ad-for-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mediasmith VP Weighs in on comScore/Quantcast</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/mediasmith-vp-weighs-in-on-comscorequantcast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/mediasmith-vp-weighs-in-on-comscorequantcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100126-165206.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The hubbub over comScore's payment requirement for its direct-measurement service, and its subsequent squabble with Quancast brought to the fore issues that have long been on the minds of site publishers and measurement firms. For background, check out my <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636267">story</a>, published yesterday.</p>

<p>But what do media buyers think about this stuff? I asked Derek Leedy,VP, account director at Mediasmith, who responded via e-mail. To Leedy, comScore and Quantcast or other audience measurement firms are complementary data sources - all of value when it comes to planning and buying online ads. </p>

<p>"There can't be too many data sources for media buyers - to choose one over the other for all cases is a cop out," he told me.</p>

<p>Leedy on Why comScore/Quantcast is Apples/Oranges:<br />
<blockquote>I believe that the scuffle stems from a misunderstanding about the distinction between the services. Quancast has a great hybrid methodology that captures traffic levels, demographics, frequency and profiles which we can then use to target 'look alikes' in other sites.</p>

<p>ComScore has a long track record of passive data and panel data that enables us to create plans and strategies for long term campaigns.</p>

<p>...ComScore is suffering a backlash for charging significant dollars for what appears to be free information for quite some time. That isn't the real case. They offer much deeper analytics and triangulation of the audience and sites.</blockquote></p>

<p>On Real-Time Data:<br />
<blockquote>Everything is about "real time" right now, and buyers want actionable and effective data quick and cheap. Quantcast is better positioned to serve this need to capture individual profiles and bring the message to the target audience.</p>

<p>ComScore, however, will continue to offer solid data from which we can create sound campaigns.  </blockquote></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
<div style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f1864ffc-90b7-405c-afbf-aadf7fcbd17e/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none;float: right" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f1864ffc-90b7-405c-afbf-aadf7fcbd17e" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"></span></div></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/sQB1-c4M_9Y" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hubbub over comScore's payment requirement for its direct-measurement service, and its subsequent squabble with Quancast brought to the fore issues that have long been on the minds of site publishers and measurement firms. For background, check out my <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3636267">story</a>, published yesterday.</p>

<p>But what do media buyers think about this stuff? I asked Derek Leedy,VP, account director at Mediasmith, who responded via e-mail. To Leedy, comScore and Quantcast or other audience measurement firms are complementary data sources - all of value when it comes to planning and buying online ads. </p>

<p>"There can't be too many data sources for media buyers - to choose one over the other for all cases is a cop out," he told me.</p>

<p>Leedy on Why comScore/Quantcast is Apples/Oranges:<br />
<blockquote>I believe that the scuffle stems from a misunderstanding about the distinction between the services. Quancast has a great hybrid methodology that captures traffic levels, demographics, frequency and profiles which we can then use to target 'look alikes' in other sites.</p>

<p>ComScore has a long track record of passive data and panel data that enables us to create plans and strategies for long term campaigns.</p>

<p>...ComScore is suffering a backlash for charging significant dollars for what appears to be free information for quite some time. That isn't the real case. They offer much deeper analytics and triangulation of the audience and sites.</blockquote></p>

<p>On Real-Time Data:<br />
<blockquote>Everything is about "real time" right now, and buyers want actionable and effective data quick and cheap. Quantcast is better positioned to serve this need to capture individual profiles and bring the message to the target audience.</p>

<p>ComScore, however, will continue to offer solid data from which we can create sound campaigns.  </blockquote></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
<div  class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f1864ffc-90b7-405c-afbf-aadf7fcbd17e/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img  class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f1864ffc-90b7-405c-afbf-aadf7fcbd17e" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/sQB1-c4M_9Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/mediasmith-vp-weighs-in-on-comscorequantcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Absurdly Irrelevent Gmail Ads? They May Get Better</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100121-125535.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gmail users love to kvetch about how bad ads on the service are. Ostensibly targeted to the content of an e-mail message, these placements are typically off the mark in terms of matching a person's interests, her purchase intent, or even the context of a message she is reading. </p>

<p>Well, that may be about to change -- if only slightly -- as Google modifies its tactics for delivering these messages. From now on, the company plans to deliver some ads in Gmail based on the content of previous messages -- a version of behavioral targeting it already practices in its search results. The move allows Google to dip into a larger pool of user data to match a consumer to potentially relevant ads.</p>

<p>This is something Google didn't do before. For instance, a person who reads many e-mails on the subject of miniature trains is probably accustomed to seeing ads for toy freight cars and cabooses adjacent to those messages. But chances are he's never seen them next to happy birthday messages from his great aunt Bea. Beginning over the next few days, that changes. That contextually pointless birthday message will in all likelihood contain the same train-related ads the other ones do. </p>

<p>In a <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/serving-better-ads-in-gmail.html?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed:+OfficialGmailBlog+%28Gmail+Blog%29">blog post on the shift</a>, Google sought to reassure Gmail users about the privacy risk associated. </p>

<p>"To show these ads, our systems don't need to store any extra information -- Gmail just picks a different recent email to match," it stated. "The process is entirely automated: no humans are involved in selecting ads, and no email or personal information is shared with advertisers."</p>

<p>Google also posted the below video to drive home the same point.</p>

<p></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/QnZqFQMUPOk" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail users love to kvetch about how bad ads on the service are. Ostensibly targeted to the content of an e-mail message, these placements are typically off the mark in terms of matching a person's interests, her purchase intent, or even the context of a message she is reading. </p>

<p>Well, that may be about to change -- if only slightly -- as Google modifies its tactics for delivering these messages. From now on, the company plans to deliver some ads in Gmail based on the content of previous messages -- a version of behavioral targeting it already practices in its search results. The move allows Google to dip into a larger pool of user data to match a consumer to potentially relevant ads.</p>

<p>This is something Google didn't do before. For instance, a person who reads many e-mails on the subject of miniature trains is probably accustomed to seeing ads for toy freight cars and cabooses adjacent to those messages. But chances are he's never seen them next to happy birthday messages from his great aunt Bea. Beginning over the next few days, that changes. That contextually pointless birthday message will in all likelihood contain the same train-related ads the other ones do. </p>

<p>In a <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/serving-better-ads-in-gmail.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+OfficialGmailBlog+%28Gmail+Blog%29">blog post on the shift</a>, Google sought to reassure Gmail users about the privacy risk associated. </p>

<p>"To show these ads, our systems don't need to store any extra information -- Gmail just picks a different recent email to match," it stated. "The process is entirely automated: no humans are involved in selecting ads, and no email or personal information is shared with advertisers."</p>

<p>Google also posted the below video to drive home the same point.</p>

<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zcu0S6r6wPI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zcu0S6r6wPI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/QnZqFQMUPOk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Absurdly Irrelevent Gmail Ads? They May Get Better</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100121-125535.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gmail users love to kvetch about how bad ads on the service are. Ostensibly targeted to the content of an e-mail message, these placements are typically off the mark in terms of matching a person's interests, her purchase intent, or even the context of a message she is reading. </p>

<p>Well, that may be about to change -- if only slightly -- as Google modifies its tactics for delivering these messages. From now on, the company plans to deliver some ads in Gmail based on the content of previous messages -- a version of behavioral targeting it already practices in its search results. The move allows Google to dip into a larger pool of user data to match a consumer to potentially relevant ads.</p>

<p>This is something Google didn't do before. For instance, a person who reads many e-mails on the subject of miniature trains is probably accustomed to seeing ads for toy freight cars and cabooses adjacent to those messages. But chances are he's never seen them next to happy birthday messages from his great aunt Bea. Beginning over the next few days, that changes. That contextually pointless birthday message will in all likelihood contain the same train-related ads the other ones do. </p>

<p>In a <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/serving-better-ads-in-gmail.html?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed:+OfficialGmailBlog+%28Gmail+Blog%29">blog post on the shift</a>, Google sought to reassure Gmail users about the privacy risk associated. </p>

<p>"To show these ads, our systems don't need to store any extra information -- Gmail just picks a different recent email to match," it stated. "The process is entirely automated: no humans are involved in selecting ads, and no email or personal information is shared with advertisers."</p>

<p>Google also posted the below video to drive home the same point.</p>

<p></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/QnZqFQMUPOk" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail users love to kvetch about how bad ads on the service are. Ostensibly targeted to the content of an e-mail message, these placements are typically off the mark in terms of matching a person's interests, her purchase intent, or even the context of a message she is reading. </p>

<p>Well, that may be about to change -- if only slightly -- as Google modifies its tactics for delivering these messages. From now on, the company plans to deliver some ads in Gmail based on the content of previous messages -- a version of behavioral targeting it already practices in its search results. The move allows Google to dip into a larger pool of user data to match a consumer to potentially relevant ads.</p>

<p>This is something Google didn't do before. For instance, a person who reads many e-mails on the subject of miniature trains is probably accustomed to seeing ads for toy freight cars and cabooses adjacent to those messages. But chances are he's never seen them next to happy birthday messages from his great aunt Bea. Beginning over the next few days, that changes. That contextually pointless birthday message will in all likelihood contain the same train-related ads the other ones do. </p>

<p>In a <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/serving-better-ads-in-gmail.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+OfficialGmailBlog+%28Gmail+Blog%29">blog post on the shift</a>, Google sought to reassure Gmail users about the privacy risk associated. </p>

<p>"To show these ads, our systems don't need to store any extra information -- Gmail just picks a different recent email to match," it stated. "The process is entirely automated: no humans are involved in selecting ads, and no email or personal information is shared with advertisers."</p>

<p>Google also posted the below video to drive home the same point.</p>

<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zcu0S6r6wPI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zcu0S6r6wPI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/QnZqFQMUPOk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/those-absurdly-irrelevent-gmail-ads-they-may-get-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will iPhone Give Bing a Lift? (Morning Reading)</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/will-iphone-give-bing-a-lift-morning-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/will-iphone-give-bing-a-lift-morning-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100121-105326.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>A few stories ClickZ's editors are reading:</em></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc20100119_759795.htm">Apple, Microsoft Discuss Giving Bing Top iPhone Billing</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>BusinessWeek</em></strong><br />
Microsoft search engine may become default on iPhone.</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703405704575015362653644260.html"><strong>Apple Sees New Money in Old Media </strong></a><br />
<strong><em>WSJ</em></strong><br />
More details on upcoming tablet device and Apple's talks with book and magazine publishers. </p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/20/140-proof-rolls-out-ad-network-for-twitter-clients/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Reader">140 Proof Rolls Out Ad Network For Twitter Clients</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>TechCrunch</em></strong><br />
Ad network bypasses Twitter completely and allows third party clients sell ad space.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/technology/internet/21youtube.html?partner=rss&#38;emc=rss">YouTube Takes a Small Step Into the Film Rental Market </a></strong><br />
<strong><em>New York Times</em></strong><br />
Experiment begins with five movies, all from independent filmmakers.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-newhulu21-2010jan21,0,1871796.story">At Hulu, 'Free' May Soon Turn Into 'Fee'</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>L.A. Times</em></strong><br />
Video site considers charging for episodes of popular shows.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2010/commercial-observer/google-gobbles-57k-more-feet-taconic%E2%80%99s-111-eighth"><strong>Google Grabs More Office Space in Manhattan</strong></a><br />
<strong><em>NY Observer</em></strong><br />
Signs deal for 57,000 additional square feet in Chelsea building.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.owl.com/about/"><strong>AOL Launches Knowledge and Research Property</strong></a><br />
<strong><em>Owl</em></strong><br />
Owl.com will likely be a repository for uch of the content assigned by the company's new Seed.com content development platform. <br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/vKc2flLCp8c" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A few stories ClickZ's editors are reading:</em></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc20100119_759795.htm">Apple, Microsoft Discuss Giving Bing Top iPhone Billing</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>BusinessWeek</em></strong><br />
Microsoft search engine may become default on iPhone.</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703405704575015362653644260.html"><strong>Apple Sees New Money in Old Media </strong></a><br />
<strong><em>WSJ</em></strong><br />
More details on upcoming tablet device and Apple's talks with book and magazine publishers. </p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/20/140-proof-rolls-out-ad-network-for-twitter-clients/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&utm_content=Google+Reader">140 Proof Rolls Out Ad Network For Twitter Clients</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>TechCrunch</em></strong><br />
Ad network bypasses Twitter completely and allows third party clients sell ad space.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/technology/internet/21youtube.html?partner=rss&emc=rss">YouTube Takes a Small Step Into the Film Rental Market </a></strong><br />
<strong><em>New York Times</em></strong><br />
Experiment begins with five movies, all from independent filmmakers.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-newhulu21-2010jan21,0,1871796.story">At Hulu, 'Free' May Soon Turn Into 'Fee'</a></strong><br />
<strong><em>L.A. Times</em></strong><br />
Video site considers charging for episodes of popular shows.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2010/commercial-observer/google-gobbles-57k-more-feet-taconic%E2%80%99s-111-eighth"><strong>Google Grabs More Office Space in Manhattan</strong></a><br />
<strong><em>NY Observer</em></strong><br />
Signs deal for 57,000 additional square feet in Chelsea building.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.owl.com/about/"><strong>AOL Launches Knowledge and Research Property</strong></a><br />
<strong><em>Owl</em></strong><br />
Owl.com will likely be a repository for uch of the content assigned by the company's new Seed.com content development platform. <br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/vKc2flLCp8c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/will-iphone-give-bing-a-lift-morning-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask&#8217;s Dictionary.com Gets Cheered Up</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/asks-dictionary-com-gets-cheered-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/asks-dictionary-com-gets-cheered-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickZ Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clickz.com/100119-180849.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com-owned Dictionary.com and Thesaurus.com are extra clean today. Users checking out either of those sites today will notice unique branding from detergent brand Cheer. The entire homepages of both sites are blue and sparkly, just like the "sparkling bright" washing liquid.</p>

<p>And, yes, you can still search for naughty words. I tried. It works.</p>


<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/dictionary.comcheerad.jpg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/J4B2UWICTXs" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com-owned Dictionary.com and Thesaurus.com are extra clean today. Users checking out either of those sites today will notice unique branding from detergent brand Cheer. The entire homepages of both sites are blue and sparkly, just like the "sparkling bright" washing liquid.</p>

<p>And, yes, you can still search for naughty words. I tried. It works.</p>

<center>
<img src="http://blog.clickz.com/dictionary.comcheerad.jpg"></center><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/clickzblog/~4/J4B2UWICTXs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/clickznewsblog/2010/01/asks-dictionary-com-gets-cheered-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
